Peace Homes Aluva

Simplify Building Your Dream Home

WE BUILD BEST ARCHITECT DESIGN

Our Services

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

Design, estimation, Supervision and Construction of residential and commercial buildings viz.

2D and 3D drawings
Statutory drawing submission for authority approval
Structural design

HOUSE DECOR
HOUSE DECOR

Air conditioning design
Hot and cold water systems design and installation.
Interior design and installation.
Electrical designs, installation

EXTERIOR DESIGN
EXTERIOR DESIGN

Drainage, Sewerage and Stormwater systems design and installation.

ALL ARCHITECTURE DESIGN SOLUTIONS

Our Portfolio

HOME RENOVATIONS
HOME RENOVATIONS
EXTERIOR RENOVATION
EXTERIOR RENOVATION
ARCHITECTURE DESIGN
ARCHITECTURE DESIGN
INTERIOR DESIGN
INTERIOR DESIGN

WHAT OUR CLIENTS SAY ABOUT US

Our Testimonials

"You guys are legendary! You guys are great and having amazing support & service. I couldn’t ask for any better. Thank you!"

Rosa Linn
Rosa Linn Designer

"Very prompt service"

Herman Girard
Herman Girard Sales Manager

"Experts advice is always at hand."

Alexia Dior
Alexia Dior Designer

OUR LATEST NEWS

Recent Updates

Mappila Lahala

Mappila Lahala refers to the 1921 Malabar Rebellion, also known as the Moplah Rebellion, a major uprising by the Mappila (Moplah) Muslim community in the Malabar region of Kerala against British colonial rule and local Hindu landlords. In Malayalam, “Lahala” means riot or rebellion, framing it as a turbulent peasant revolt.

Historical Context

The rebellion erupted on August 20, 1921, in Tirurangadi after police arrested Khilafat movement leaders, sparking widespread attacks on British symbols like police stations, courts, and telegraph lines. Fueled by resentment over exploitative feudal jenmi (landlord) systems and the suppression of the Khilafat Movement, Mappilas in Eranad and Valluvanad taluks seized control, declaring “Khilafat kingdoms”.

Key Events and Violence

 

Rebels, led by figures like Variyamkunnath Kunjahammed Haji, targeted colonial infrastructure and Hindu landlords, resulting in thousands of deaths, forced conversions, and atrocities against Hindu communities. British forces brutally suppressed it over months, with over 2,000 Mappilas killed and events like the Wagon Tragedy highlighting the scale.

Interpretations and Legacy

Some view it as an anti-imperialist peasant uprising recognized by Kerala as freedom fighters in 1971, while others emphasize communal riots due to anti-Hindu violence. Debates persist, with terms like “Mappila Lahala” highlighting its riotous nature in local narratives.

 
 
 
Modern views on Mappila Lahala as freedom fight or riot
 

Modern views on Mappila Lahala (the 1921 Malabar Rebellion) remain deeply polarized in Kerala and India, split between seeing it as an anti-colonial freedom struggle and a communal riot marked by anti-Hindu violence.

Freedom Struggle Perspective

Leftist groups, Congress, and the Kerala government (which recognized rebels as “freedom fighters” in 1971) portray it as a peasant uprising against British rule and exploitative Hindu landlords, tied to the Khilafat Movement. Historians sympathetic to this view emphasize its anti-imperialist roots and non-Mappila participation, framing it as a nationalist upheaval.

Communal Riot Perspective

Right-wing groups like BJP and RSS label it the “first Jihadi massacre” or “Talibanism” in India, highlighting forced conversions, temple destructions, and killings of over 2,000 Hindus by Mappila rebels. They criticize historical whitewashing and point to British records calling it “outrages”.

Ongoing Debates

Centenary events in 2021 reignited clashes, with BJP opposing martyr status and Kerala leaders accusing them of distortion. Academic sources note agrarian triggers evolving into religious conflict, while local Malayalam narratives often stress its riotous (“Lahala”) nature.

Perspective Key Proponents Main Arguments
Freedom Fight Kerala Govt (1971), Left/Congress  Anti-British peasant revolt; Khilafat link 
Communal Riot BJP/RSS  Anti-Hindu violence, forced conversions 
 
 
 
Who were the key leaders like Variyamkunnath Kunjahammed Haji
 

Variyamkunnath Kunjahammed Haji was a central leader of the 1921 Mappila Lahala (Malabar Rebellion), known for establishing a short-lived Khilafat “kingdom” in Ernad and Valluvanad taluks with its own administration, army, and currency. Other key figures like him included Ali Musaliyar, Sithi Koya Thangal, and Chembrasery Thangal, who mobilized Mappila peasants against British rule and landlords.

Prominent Leaders

  • Ali Musaliyar: Early spark of the rebellion; Khilafat leader arrested in Tirurangadi, leading to the uprising’s launch. He was executed by British forces after capture.

  • Sithi Koya Thangal: Religious leader who rallied rebels and coordinated attacks on colonial outposts.

  • Chembrasery Thangal: Key organizer in Valluvanad, focused on guerrilla tactics post-initial phase.

Their Roles and Fate

These leaders, often from scholarly or affluent Mappila backgrounds, framed the revolt as anti-imperialist while targeting exploitative jenmis; Kunjahammed Haji notably protected non-Muslims initially to maintain unity. Most were killed in British suppression by 1922, with Haji dying in a forest encounter on January 20.

Leader Key Contribution Outcome 
Variyamkunnath Kunjahammed Haji Parallel govt, army leader Killed Jan 1922
Ali Musaliyar Initial uprising trigger Executed by British
Sithi Koya Thangal Mobilization, attacks Captured and killed
 
 
 
Details on Kattilassery Muhammad Musaliyar leadership
 

Kattilassery Muhammad Musaliyar (also spelled Kattilassery Muhammed Moulavi) was a prominent Mappila religious scholar, preacher, and early leader in the Khilafat and tenancy movements leading up to the 1921 Mappila Lahala in Malabar, Kerala.

Early Role and Activism

Named after his role as khateeb (preacher) at Kattilassery mosque near Perinthalmanna, he collaborated with Congress leaders like M.P. Narayana Menon and K. Madhavan Nair to organize peasant strikes against exploitative Hindu landlords (jenmis) and their agents. He issued counter-fatwas challenging pro-landlord religious edicts, mobilized Muslim tenants through Kudiyan Sangham (Tenants’ Association), and promoted non-violent Khilafat committees across south Malabar.

During the Rebellion

As president of the Malabar Khilafat Committee, he adhered to Gandhi’s non-violence, criticizing violent rebels like Ali Musaliyar and trying to curb the uprising’s spread to Valluvanad. British authorities targeted him for arrest alongside Variyamkunnath Kunjahammed Haji; he protected some jenmi families during chaos.

Later Contributions

Post-rebellion, he focused on education reform, founding schools like Makhtabat al Sumiyya (Punarppa) and Ma’danul Uloom (Pulamanthole), and served as Vice President of Malabar District Board in 1937, advocating for Mappila upliftment.

 
 
Every ship in Hormuz will have to pay Iran – here’s what it means for India and the world

Every ship in Hormuz will have to pay Iran – here’s what it means for India and the world

Story by Tarique Anwar
 • 9h • 

2 min read

 

Every ship in Hormuz will have to pay Iran – Here’s what it means for India and the world

 

Tehran: As tensions continue to ripple through one of the world’s busiest energy corridors, Iran is preparing to introduce a new law that could change how ships pass through the Strait of Hormuz. The proposed legislation aims to levy a toll tax on vessels using the maritime route.

call to action icon
 

Iranian state media, including Fars and Tasnim, have reported that the draft law is in the works to impose transit fees on ships crossing the Strait of Hormuz. The proposal is presently being finalised and is expected to be reviewed by the country’s legal authorities before moving through the legislative process.

A senior member of Iran’s parliamentary civil affairs committee confirmed that the proposal has already been prepared. Officials say the idea is that Iran provides security along this narrow maritime passage, making it reasonable for the country to charge vessels for safe transit.

Security costs at the core of proposal

Officials familiar with the plan say the proposed charges are meant to cover the cost of securing ships passing through the strait. They point out that similar fees are common in other international transit routes, where countries charge for safe passage.

The official cited in the reports has not been named, though the comments point to Tehran’s effort to formalise its role in protecting the route while also creating a new source of revenue.

 

Massive revenue potential

Shipping analysts tracking maritime movements say that Iran has already collected fees from some vessels, with amounts reportedly reaching up to $2 million per ship in certain cases. Estimates indicate that Tehran could be aiming to generate as much as $75 billion through such measures.

The Strait of Hormuz carries nearly 20 percent of the world’s energy supplies, including crude oil and liquefied natural gas. Any change in how ships are allowed to pass through this chokepoint has immediate implications for international markets.

Recent disruptions in the strait have created pressure on several South Asian economies, including India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, all of which depend heavily on energy imports routed through this passage.

Selective access for friendly nations

Iran’s Foreign Minister Syed Abbas Araghchi has said that ships from certain countries will continue to pass without restrictions. These include India, China, Pakistan, Iraq and Russia, which Tehran considers friendly nations.

This selective approach suggests that while the proposed toll system may tighten control over the strait, it could also be used as a diplomatic lever, influencing access based on geopolitical relationships.

With the draft law nearing completion, attention is now on how international shipping companies and governments respond. The Strait of Hormuz is a lifeline for energy trade, and any change in its rules is set to ripple far beyond the region.